Forget about that labradoodle: A new report suggests household allergens are no lower in homes that keep hypoallergenic dogs versus hairier, dander-heavy breeds.
"We found no scientific basis to the claim hypoallergenic dogs have less allergen," senior author Christine Cole Johnson said in a release.
"Exposure to a dog early in life provides protection against dog allergy development. But the idea that you can buy a certain breed of dog and think it will cause less allergy problems for a person already dog-allergic is not borne out by our study," said Dr. Johnson, who chairs the Department of Public Health Sciences at Detroit's Henry Ford Hospital.
It's been long thought that hypoallergenic dogs such as poodles and Portuguese Water Dogs (the preferred breed of the Obamas) generate less dander and shed less.
In the current study, researchers analyzed dust samples from 173 households, one month after a newborn was brought home. The samples came from the carpet or floor in the baby's room; the study only included homes with one dog.
Sixty dog breeds were involved, 11 of them considered hypoallergenic. Researchers found no significant differences in allergen levels in homes where either hypoallergenic dogs or non-hypoallergenic resided.
To boot, in homes where the dog was forbidden from entering the baby's room, allergen levels were slightly higher in homes with hypoallergenic dogs versus homes housing their non-hypoallergenic counterparts.
The study, to be published online this month in the peer-reviewed American Journal of Rhinology and Allergy, concludes that parents should not rely on breeds classified as hypoallergenic.
The American Kennel Club lists a number of breeds "that generally do well with people with allergies."
They include Schnauzers, Bichon Frise, Chinese Crested, and Xoloitzcuintli (that's the newly recognized Mexican Hairless Dog).
But the Association is clear on its caveat: "This list is based on breeds which usually produce less dander. The American Kennel Club does not recommend or endorse any specific breed, nor does it claim that the listed breeds will not affect people with allergies."
What are your thoughts?
I do agree that being expose to dogs or cats when young will provides that protection and the person will not have as much or as severe allergy than the one who do not have any contact with them.
Hypoallergenic dogs or cat do not exist.
Very good study. Thanks Lynne
I've seen posts elsewhere about a test that can be done on the dog to see how allergic one might be to it? Am not sure that's how I wanted to say that, but couldn't word it any differently. Lynne, any info on that and how one might have a dog tested? Do you test both the dog and the potential owner? I'm sure it would be expensive, but worth it to us. DH is terribly allergic but I want a family dog, not a dog that spends all it's time outdoors. Sam loved it, thank goodness, as he was a beagle (mostly) and very uncomfortable in the house. But when we get a new baby, and I'm sooo ready, it has to be in the house. Has to be.
I haven't heard of a test to do on the dog and I am not sure how reliable it would be because every dog and every human is different. If your hubby is that allergic, you should get a poodle or other completely non-shed breed. But that is still no 100% guarantee that he will not have a problem.